United Nations Conference on Climate Change - Copenhagen
Thousands of people, including the very wealthy elite, are meeting right now in Copenhagen, Denmark, at the United Nations Conference on Climate Change to discuss how to force the world governments into putting in place efforts to stop global warming by shutting down the modern world economies and controlling the actions of people everywhere. They are planning on approving a treaty that they expect all the countries in the world to ratify, that will turn back carbon fuel emissions by about 85% by the year 2050. What they don’t tell the people of the world is that this will require that our modern industrial society be shut down. Life as we know it must be curtailed. Not only this, but the proposals will be outrageously expensive and “we the people” are going to be expected to pay for it.
The really serious part is that President Obama is going to be at the conference tomorrow December 9, 2009. He is expected to endorse all the plans, goals, and objectives of the conference. Mr Obama and his advisers have just ignored the revelations about the falsifying of data.
The truth is that the Copenhagen treaty has already been written. People know what it contains. The treaty is about global governance of the people of the world. The Conference is only being held to deceive, to give the people of the world the impression that thousands of people from all countries around the world have gotten together to make these far reaching decisions in the face of certain calamity if they don’t act. The fact is the treaty was written in secret by the global elite who want these policies put in place so they can control the world.
Here are more articles about what has become known as Climategate, the effort of climate scientists to falsify data to push their global warming scam and deceive the people of the world into believing that we are headed for a catastrophe if we don’t put in place serious controls on human activity. In case you have not understood the seriousness of the issue, here are some statements from one of the articles below:
“This may seem obscure, but the science involved is being used to justify the diversion of literally trillions of dollars of the world’s wealth in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by phasing out fossil fuels. The CRU is the Pentagon of global warming science, and these documents are its Pentagon Papers.”
“The three vital things the documents indicated were that ‘the scientists discuss manipulating data to get their preferred results,’ talked about ‘subverting the scientific peer review process’ to prevent skeptics from being published, and worked to prevent disclosure of the information.”
“But the leaked e-mails were only the tip of the iceberg. According to the London Times online, scientists at the University of East Anglia ‘admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.”
The article described the CRU (Climate Research Unit) at the University of East Anglia as “the world’s leading centre for reconstructing past climate and temperature.”
In case you would like to understand the issue better here are more articles that are available on the internet. You have to discover the truth about this climate scam on the internet because the establishment media have not hardly reported that Climategate even happened even though the issue is extremely important because very important decisions made by governments around the world are being based on phony data.
12 Days, 3 Networks and No mention of ClimateGate Scandal – December 2, 2009
http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2009/20091202135822.aspx
The Left’s Climategate: A Scandal for Journalism, Too – December 3, 2009
http://www.mediaresearch.org/realitycheck/realitycheck/2009/20091203094216.aspx
White House Dismisses ‘Climategate’ Because ‘Most People” Believe in Global Warming – December 1, 2009
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/57795
Inhofe Asks Boxer to Investigate Possible Scientific ‘Conspiracy’ in ‘Climategate’ – December 1, 2009
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/57879
Here are a couple of the first articles to expose the conspiracy to keep the truth from the public about the phony global warming scam.
Possible Conspiracy To Falsify Temperature Data Uncovered – November 20, 2009
Climate Gate Totally Ignored by TV News Outlets Except Fox – November 24, 2009
If “we the people” don’t speak up and stop what is happening in Copenhagen, or at least understand it and tell our politicians that we don’t believe it, “we the people” will suffer as they implement the economy destroying proposals. This Climategate revelation that became public on November 20, 2009 is literally a gift from God to let us know what is really happening if we will understand it, believe it, and use.
The New President’s Foreign Policy - The Debate
Linked below are all four installments of a four-part report from Stratfor founder and Chief Intelligence Officer, George Friedman, on the United States Presidential Debate on Foreign Policy held September 26, 2008.
On Friday night, every government intelligence agency in the world was glued to television sets watching the US Presidential Debate on foreign policy. Government intelligence agencies are not rooting for one candidate or the other, nor are they trying to call the “winner” of the debate - or even ultimately the election.
A government intelligence agency’s goal is to provide national policy makers an unbiased analysis of contingencies. In this instance, they’re attempting to answer two questions, “What will US foreign policy look like under an Obama or McCain administration? And how will that impact our country?”
Stratfor is a private-sector, independent intelligence service and approaches the debates from a similar perspective. They have zero preference for one candidate or the other, but are passionately interested in analyzing and forecasting the geopolitical impact of the election.
The essence of Stratfor’s business is non-partisan, dispassionate analysis and forecasting. For individuals in today’s global world - oil traders and missionaries, soldiers and equity analysts, educators and travelers - Stratfor provides the intelligence analysis that has long been exclusively available to governments.
All four installments are linked here:
Click here to read the first installment - Part 1 - “The New President and the Global Landscape.”
This introductory piece frames the questions that the next president will face. Regardless of a given candidate’s policy preferences, there are logistical and geographical constraints that shape US and foreign options. The purpose of this analysis is to describe the geopolitical landscape for the next administration. The analysis concludes with a list of questions for the debate that define the parameters facing both candidates.
Click here to read the second installment - Part 2 - Obama’s Foreign Policy Stance
Senator Obama has issued position papers and made statements about his intended foreign policy. Like all Presidents, he would also be getting input from a variety of others, principally from his own party. This second analysis analyzes the foreign policy position of Sen. Obama and the Democratic Party.
Click here to read the third installment - Part 3 - McCain’s Foreign Policy Stance
Senator McCain has issued position papers and made statements about his intended foreign policy. Like all Presidents, he would also be getting input from a variety of others, principally from his own party. This second analysis analyzes the foreign policy position of Sen. McCain and the Republican Party.
Click here to read the fourth installment - Part 4 - George Friedman on the Presidential Debate
The final installment in this series was produced after the debate. This is NOT an effort to call a “winner” or “loser.” That’s for pundits, not an intelligence service. This is an analysis of the candidates’ statements and positions.
Part 1 - The New President and the Global Landscape
Part 2 - Obama’s Foreign Policy Stance
Part 3 - McCain’s Foreign Policy Stance
Part 4 - George Friedman on the Presidential Debate
Very Different Visions for America
If you click on this link you can read an article that appears today in USATODAY entitled Very Different Visions. The writer says that the conventions of the Republican and Democratic parties clearly showed the difference between the parties. The Democrats continually painted themselves as the party of the losers in society, those that have been left behind, hurt by the gales of the supposedly cruel free market. The Republicans painted themselves as the party of winners and those who want to be winners. I like what Mike Huckabee said. He said, I’m not a Republican because I grew up rich. I’m a Republican because I didn’t want to spend the rest of my life poor, waiting for the government to rescue me.” Read more
Barrack Obama - The Jihad Candidate
I received an email this morning from a friend. He says he received it from his brother-in-law. The writer of the article is Rich Carroll. I do not know who Rich Carroll is. He obivously links Barack Obama to the Muslim Brotherhood. After I read the article in the email I decided to see if there could be any basis in reality to what Rich is saying. I typed the name Mohamed Akram and Muslim Brotherhood, into Google to see what would come up. Below are three links that came up. If any of you know any more about the Muslim Brotherhood I would like to hear from you. I recommend that you read the article by Rich Carroll (Click on the Rich Carroll link) before you read the links below. Then the links will make more sense to you.
The Muslim Student Association and the Jihad Network
An Explanatory Memorancum on the General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in North America (Click on the “View Full Document” link to read the full document. The first few pages are in Arabic. You have to page down past these pages to get to the English version.) http://www.investigativeproject.org/document/id/20
Rich Carroll’s article is here.
